Unit 4 Soil as Belonging

Soil underlies human activity and society in the very physical and biological sense. It’s the literal foundation for any kind of be(long)ing, because the cultivation of land feeds our bodies. However, human attachment to soil often includes a series of abstractions, transforming soils from a physical substrate into ownership (like property in land), or place (homeland, locality). Both senses relate to the words belong and belonging, which come from older Dutch and German words for demand, obtain, reach for, and long for. What is the circular feedback between the conception of land as an object of belonging and soil as a container and enabler of life? How do we grapple with the differences or similarities between feeling tied to a particular place on earth and a political project that aims to tie belonging to the soil through a rhetoric of blood, purity, and ultimately violence?

Day 1: Soil and Sense of Place

Today’s focus is on thinking and reading about how soil and our sensorial experience of it can often evoke a feeling of home.

Questions

  • Do you see soil somewhere around where you live?
  • Can you define what kind of soil it is? What is its texture? Smell? Taste?
  • Do you consider soil part of your sense of home?

Lesson plan: Get Down On the Ground

We tend to avoid the ground. It’s fine to walk on and maybe to dig with a shovel, but most people who are not farmers avoid contact with the soils that sustain all the grass, trees, and other plants all around us. While in Unit 1 we took a more removed eye to assessing soil’s textures and components, now it’s time to use the other senses as well. What does the smell or even taste of soil evoke for you?

One of the members of our seminar had this experience: I was on the ground playing with my child when I smelled something deeply familiar. It was the soil, which I had known when I was her age. Time and the growth of my body had distanced me from interacting with soil, its texture, its smell, all of its properties, as intimately as I once did.

Understanding soil in all the ways expressed in this syllabus must begin with the stuff itself. It’s not an idea–it’s a substance made up of living and non-living things. The first assignment is to smell it, taste it, and feel it wherever you live.

Some examples of what engaging with soil in this way might evoke:

The artist Laura Parker suggests tasting soil and created an interactive-installation called Taste of Place in which she held soil tastings with samples from eighty-six farms. Taste your soils and write a paragraph about the experience.

Or, read the first two pages of The Known World here to consider the tangled ways tasting soil can evoke a lifetime of accrued knowledge of a place.

Here is another article that helps reconnect with what it is like to dig in the dirt:

Emma Marris, “Tending Soil,” Emergence Magazine

Assignment 2: Soils and Home

How does soil type help to define your place in the world? It’s a strange question because you probably had no idea what your local soil is called or what it’s made of but it certainly has played a role in what makes up the ecology of your region.

Take a look at the World Soil Explorer, which allows you to see soil types in any country, city, and even locality. If you live in the United States, you can look up your state’s official soil: the soil most common in your state.

The American naturalist and philosopher Henry David Thoreau engaged in a kind of experiment in 1845. He built a very small house and lived on the shore of Walden Pond for two years, two months, and two days. In Walden, Thoreau writes about the entire environment of the pond. One of the things he did in those years was to grow acres of beans for himself and to exchange for other locally-grown products.

Read the first few pages of “The Beanfield” from Walden. How does cultivating the soil’s of Concord, Massachusetts, deepen Thoreau’s relationship to his native town? Where would you live to be close to your soils and how do you think the experience would change you?

Where would you live to be close to your soils and how do you think the experience would change you?

Day 2: Blood and Soil, Race and Nation

Romantic illustrations of soil, landscapes, vegetation, forests, light, plants, flowers, crosses, and ruins encapsulate the human longing for connecting to the land and nature as locus amoenus (idealized place) of their origin. Cultivating the land in the agricultural sense but also recreationally, e.g. in the form of Wandervereine (hiking organizations). This desire to connect to the land is prone to being manipulated to form a rigid collective identity, as prominently happened during German fascism and its blood and soil fantasies that fed off the emergence of race theory in the 19th century and its subsequent proliferation not only in Europe but also in the rest of the world. Going back to the old Germanic tribes, National Socialists claimed that their intimate connection to the farmland boosted the eugenic potency of their blood and furthermore enabled them to ultimately dominate over soil. While the intimate relationship between soil and people can be weaponized to put a racial claim on the land, the mobile and fluid nature of soil can help us to deconstruct these claims.

Questions

  • How/when does soil become an object of collective identity?
  • What are the added layers of meaning attached to soil for it to become part of one’s identity formation?
  • What role does art—or other types of media—play in establishing this connection between blood and soil?

Assignment

In 2024, the Alte Nationalgalerie in Berlin showcased an exhibit by famous romantic painter Caspar David Friedrich (1774-1840) named Infinite Landscapes. The painter, known for depictions of endless landscapes such as Wanderer Above the Sea Fog, continues to spark the imagination of today’s visitors and connection to a communal longing for nature. At the same time, it was romantic painters like Friedrich who showed the beauty of the German landscape that the Nazis then instrumentalized to illustrate the ideological connection between blood and soil. It helped them make the case that the German soil had to be defended via bloodshed. First, take a look at the exhibition website and write down your initial thoughts. How do these paintings make you feel about your place in nature and the world? Then, in a second step, give us your thoughts about how you think idealizing nature as national territory distorts or weaponizes the sentimental feeling nature might trigger for its own purpose?

These readings might be helpful to consider and explore:

Then, read chapter 4 of Primo Levi’s Survival in Auschwitz. Here he describes an instance, where the blood of his foot drips on the soil of the camp. How is the concrete relationship he describes here different from the fascist blood and soil fantasies of purity? Are there any other instances you know where soil and ground stand in for political ideas? Here is an example. Also, this article about Kenyan politics of the soil captures how idioms of the soil and belonging are not unique to European history: Prestholdt, Jeremy. “Politics of the Soil: Separatism, Authocthony, and Decolonization at the Kenyan Coast.” The Journal of African History 55, no. 2 (July 2014): 249–70.

Also, please check out this other online syllabus—“Science in Dark Times: a syllabus on science, technology, and medicine under illiberal political regimes”—for more readings on how fascism is enacted through many forms

Day 3: Soil as property and the properties of soil

What are the connections between the properties of soil and the conditions of making soil into someone’s “property”? This day explores to whom soil belongs by asking how soil is created, defined, conceptualized, and historicized. The first two reading items under “Making Soil” supply one type of answer. Both suggest that human efforts turn land into soil, which in turn compels the right to claim land as property. Both describe an a-historical condition relying on universal law or morality. The following two items under “Unmaking Soil” describe an opposite process: how soil is eroded, who is to blame for this process, and by extension -- what are the consequences for historical rights for certain groups/societies. In contrast to the previous section, the process described here is historical and geographical. The closing section exemplifies the implication of the above questions in a relatively uncommon arena: the relations between soil, taste, and property. The first item introduces the idea of “terroir” - the expression of soil’s properties in the taste of agricultural products cultivated upon it. Terroir may be taken as an “experiential” aspect of soil properties.

The second text, the one closing this day, ties together all previous discussions by tying claims for a unique terroir to the question of indigeneity in the case of Israel and Palestine.

Readings / Other Media

Unmaking Soil: How claims of erosion and harm are also used to dispossess

Making Property / Making Soil

Questions

  • What makes land into property? Law? Boundaries? Power? What else? What is the role of soil within each of these categories?
  • How is soil made, and by whom? How is soil being destroyed and by whom? What ties the making/destruction of soil to the question of who owns it?
  • What changes with improvement/ reclamation/ removal/toxification/covering of land?
  • What is being propertied in a private property? The land? The territory? The soil? The location?

Activity: The Properties of Soil

Search “what is terroir?” on the internet and watch 2-3 videos where someone defines it. Most likely it will be a video about wine. How do they describe the relationship between wine and soil? What is your reaction? Do they articulate it in terms of science? Or an “art” of wine making? What sort of sense of taste does developing a sense of terroir require cultivating? Do you believe that terroir exists? How does the notion of terroir fit within modern agricultural systems?

Follow up this initial search with these readings:

Does food, taste, and the notion of “terroir” lead us to any new way of reconciling the challenges of how attachment to place is both essential to earthly flourishing and essentializing? We can see throughout this unit that claiming the particularities of soil as an expression of identity and belonging can run the political spectrum. One text you might consider for discussing this further is Bruno Latour’s Down to Earth. Here is an excerpt:

“It is the uprooting that is illegitimate, not the belonging. To belong to a land, to want to stay put and keep on working one's plot of land, to be attached to it, has become "reactionary", as we have seen, only by contrast with the headlong flight forward imposed by modernization. If we stop fleeing, what does the desire for attachment look like? The negotiation -- the fraternization? -- between supporters of the Local and supporters of the Terrestrial has to bear on the importance, the legitimacy, even the necessity of belonging to a land, but -- and here lies the whole difficulty -- without immediately confusing it with what the Local has added to it: ethnic homogeneity, a focus on patrimony, historicism, nostalgia, inauthentic authenticity. On the contrary, there is nothing more innovative, nothing more present, subtle, technical, and artificial (in the positive sense of the word), nothing less rustic and rural, nothing more creative, nothing more contemporary than to negotiate landing on some ground." Bruno Latour, Down to Earth, 53

Day 4: Ashes to Ashes: Cemeteries and Burial Ground

Graves and burial sites combine the two notions discussed in previous sections: ownership and ideological/emotional attachment. They are also the ultimate subsumption in the soil and what makes the soil. For example, the Nazis monumentalized the death of the soldier in their state architecture to remind the people of their duty to sacrifice their body for something higher and had extensive plans for massive military cemeteries. In Appalachia and Israel/Palestine things were handled (not) so differently. Today’s activity and readings look at two overlapping processes: the burial of bodies, which gives burial sites meaning and significance, and the conditions in which these sites themselves are being desecrated, buried, and erased by other processes.

Assignment

Go to the local cemetery. Ask yourself the question: who belongs here? Is it the people buried here, is it the squirrels roaming over the property, is it the people mourning for their lost ones, or the gardener preparing the landscape or digging around? Is it the trees and other types of vegetation growing? Is it everyone feeding off the land? What is the role of land here? What are the different layers of belonging and what is the role of the soil here in cooperation with the dead, the inanimate, and the living? Draw a mind-map that helps you visualize the different layers of belonging in relationship with the soil and write a paragraph that explains your thought process.

Then, read this entry on the website of the MET about fascist architect Wilhelm Kreis. You will learn that the Nazis dedicated an immense amount of planning in monuments mourning dead soldiers and cemeteries in general. Obviously they used the people’s emotional connection to death and mourning to cement their agenda in people’s hearts. Why do you think this is so effective, and do you know any other times and places where this tactic has been used? Is it the inevitability of our own death and that we know that one day we will be part of the soil as well?

Rural burial grounds can also be destroyed. In Appalachia, they are often located in hollows, where they can be easily buried by overburden from strip mines. Local people respond with moral outrage to the desecration of graves. Also consider our examples from Israel/Palestine. What makes every case different? What is similar?

Questions

  • What are the relations between soil and society in these images?
  • What is soil doing in this image/context?
  • How does our emotional connection to death and mourning provide the basis for collective manipulation?

Readings / Other Media